Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Nepal: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
90.8%
in 2019
Nepal
90.3%
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
133rd
Nepal rank
136th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Nepal
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 90.8% against 90.3% in Nepal, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 133rd and Nepal ranks 136th of 191 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.0% | 66.3% | 22.7% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 90.6% | 83.2% | 7.5% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Nepal?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 90.8% against 90.3% in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Nepal?
- 0.5%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Nepal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Nepal rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 133rd and Nepal ranks 136th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.