Jamaica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Jamaica
97.5%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
97.4%
in 2019
Jamaica rank
80th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
81st
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Jamaica
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 97.5% against 97.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Jamaica ranks 80th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.3% | 95.3% | 0.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 96.5% | 96.5% | 0.1% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Jamaica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Jamaica, at 97.5% against 97.4% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Jamaica ranks 80th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.