Kazakhstan vs South Korea: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income) … Score
Kazakhstan
99.6%
in 2019
South Korea
99.6%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
33rd
South Korea rank
32nd
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income) … Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 99.6% against 99.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 33rd and South Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.6% | 99.5% | 0.9% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 99.2% | 99.5% | 0.3% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Kazakhstan or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 99.6% against 99.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Kazakhstan and South Korea?
- 0.0%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and South Korea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and South Korea rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 33rd and South Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.