Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Uzbekistan: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
95.0%
in 2019
Uzbekistan
94.6%
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
107th
Uzbekistan rank
110th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 95.0% against 94.6% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 107th and Uzbekistan ranks 110th of 191 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.4% | 37.1% | 51.3% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 91.5% | 77.8% | 13.7% | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Uzbekistan?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 95.0% against 94.6% in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Uzbekistan?
- 0.4%, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Uzbekistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Uzbekistan rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 107th and Uzbekistan ranks 110th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.