Latvia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Latvia
97.1%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
97.4%
in 2019
Latvia rank
84th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
81st
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Latvia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 97.4% against 97.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.5% | 95.3% | 0.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 96.0% | 96.5% | 0.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Latvia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 97.4% against 97.1% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.3%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Latvia ranks 84th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 81st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.