Madagascar vs Mauritania: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Madagascar
46.5%
in 2019
Mauritania
51.5%
in 2019
Madagascar rank
177th
Mauritania rank
176th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Madagascar
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 51.5% against 46.5% in Madagascar, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 177th and Mauritania ranks 176th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.7% | 4.1% | 24.7% | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 35.1% | 9.3% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Madagascar or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 51.5% against 46.5% in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Madagascar and Mauritania?
- 5.0%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mauritania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Mauritania rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Madagascar ranks 177th and Mauritania ranks 176th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.