Madagascar vs Sierra Leone: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Madagascar
46.5%
in 2019
Sierra Leone
37.6%
in 2019
Madagascar rank
177th
Sierra Leone rank
179th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Madagascar
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 46.5% against 37.6% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 8.9%.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 177th and Sierra Leone ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.7% | 0.0% | 28.7% | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 30.2% | 4.3% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Madagascar or Sierra Leone?
- Madagascar, at 46.5% against 37.6% in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Madagascar and Sierra Leone?
- 8.9%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Sierra Leone?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Sierra Leone rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Madagascar ranks 177th and Sierra Leone ranks 179th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.