Maldives vs Syrian Arab Republic: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Maldives
97.1%
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
96.8%
in 2019
Maldives rank
86th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
88th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Maldives
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 97.1% against 96.8% in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 86th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.3% | 87.7% | 4.6% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 95.5% | 92.9% | 2.6% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Maldives or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Maldives, at 97.1% against 96.8% in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Maldives and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0.3%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Maldives ranks 86th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.