Mauritania vs Sierra Leone: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Mauritania
51.5%
in 2019
Sierra Leone
37.6%
in 2019
Mauritania rank
176th
Sierra Leone rank
179th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Mauritania
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 51.5% against 37.6% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 13.9%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.4 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 176th and Sierra Leone ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | 0.0% | 4.1% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 35.1% | 30.2% | 5.0% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Mauritania or Sierra Leone?
- Mauritania, at 51.5% against 37.6% in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
- 13.9%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sierra Leone?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania and Sierra Leone rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Mauritania ranks 176th and Sierra Leone ranks 179th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.