Micronesia (country) vs Seychelles: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income) … Score
Micronesia (country)
95.6%
in 2019
Seychelles
95.8%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
102nd
Seychelles rank
100th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income) … Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 95.8% against 95.6% in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Seychelles ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 102nd and Seychelles ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.3% | 94.4% | 1.0% | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 95.1% | 94.9% | 0.3% | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Micronesia (country) or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 95.8% against 95.6% in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Micronesia (country) and Seychelles?
- 0.2%, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Seychelles?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Seychelles rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 102nd and Seychelles ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.