Republic of Moldova vs Samoa: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Republic of Moldova
93.6%
in 2019
Samoa
92.6%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
116th
Samoa rank
119th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Samoa
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 93.6% against 92.6% in Samoa, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Samoa ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 116th and Samoa ranks 119th of 191 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.8% | 88.9% | 6.0% | Samoa |
| 2010s | 88.9% | 91.2% | 2.3% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Republic of Moldova or Samoa?
- Republic of Moldova, at 93.6% against 92.6% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Republic of Moldova and Samoa?
- 1.0%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Samoa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Samoa rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 116th and Samoa ranks 119th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.