Norway vs Russian Federation: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Norway
99.9%
in 2019
Russian Federation
99.9%
in 2019
Norway rank
9th
Russian Federation rank
7th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Norway
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 99.9% against 99.9% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.8% | 51.0% | 48.8% | Norway |
| 2010s | 99.9% | 89.7% | 10.1% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Norway or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 99.9% against 99.9% in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Norway and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Russian Federation?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Norway and Russian Federation rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Norway ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.