Papua New Guinea vs Philippines: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Papua New Guinea
99.7%
in 2019
Philippines
99.7%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
24th
Philippines rank
21st
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 99.7% against 99.7% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 24th and Philippines ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.1% | 90.0% | 9.1% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 99.4% | 98.6% | 0.8% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Papua New Guinea or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 99.7% against 99.7% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Philippines rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 24th and Philippines ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.