Poland vs United States: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Poland
99.8%
in 2019
United States
99.7%
in 2019
Poland rank
16th
United States rank
17th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Poland
- United States
How they compare
Poland currently reports 99.8% against 99.7% in United States, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was United States ahead.
Poland ranks 16th and United States ranks 17th of 191 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.3% | 99.8% | 2.5% | United States |
| 2010s | 99.1% | 99.7% | 0.7% | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Poland or United States?
- Poland, at 99.8% against 99.7% in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Poland and United States?
- 0.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and United States?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Poland and United States rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Poland ranks 16th and United States ranks 17th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.