Puerto Rico vs Sao Tome and Principe: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Puerto Rico
96.1%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
95.8%
in 2019
Puerto Rico rank
98th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
99th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Puerto Rico
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 96.1% against 95.8% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 98th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.6% | 91.3% | 3.4% | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 95.6% | 94.3% | 1.3% | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Puerto Rico or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Puerto Rico, at 96.1% against 95.8% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.3%, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 98th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.