Russian Federation vs Thailand: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Russian Federation
99.9%
in 2019
Thailand
100.0%
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
7th
Thailand rank
5th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Russian Federation
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 100.0% against 99.9% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Thailand ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 7th and Thailand ranks 5th of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.0% | 99.0% | 48.0% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 89.7% | 99.5% | 9.7% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Russian Federation or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 100.0% against 99.9% in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Russian Federation and Thailand?
- 0.1%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Thailand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Thailand rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Russian Federation ranks 7th and Thailand ranks 5th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.