Sao Tome and Principe vs Seychelles: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Sao Tome and Principe
95.8%
in 2019
Seychelles
95.8%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
99th
Seychelles rank
100th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Seychelles
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 95.8% against 95.8% in Seychelles, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Seychelles ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th and Seychelles ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.3% | 94.4% | 3.1% | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 94.3% | 94.9% | 0.5% | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Sao Tome and Principe or Seychelles?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 95.8% against 95.8% in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Sao Tome and Principe and Seychelles?
- 0.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Seychelles?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Seychelles rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th and Seychelles ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.