Sierra Leone vs Uganda: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Sierra Leone
37.6%
in 2019
Uganda
14.4%
in 2019
Sierra Leone rank
179th
Uganda rank
181st
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Sierra Leone
- Uganda
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 37.6% against 14.4% in Uganda, a difference of 23.2%.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 2.6 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uganda ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 179th and Uganda ranks 181st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 13.3% | 13.3% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 30.2% | 5.5% | 24.7% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Sierra Leone or Uganda?
- Sierra Leone, at 37.6% against 14.4% in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Sierra Leone and Uganda?
- 23.2%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Uganda?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Sierra Leone and Uganda rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 179th and Uganda ranks 181st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.