Singapore vs United Kingdom: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
Singapore
99.7%
in 2019
United Kingdom
99.7%
in 2019
Singapore rank
18th
United Kingdom rank
20th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- Singapore
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 99.7% against 99.7% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 18th and United Kingdom ranks 20th of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.6% | 99.1% | 0.5% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 99.7% | 99.3% | 0.4% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), Singapore or United Kingdom?
- Singapore, at 99.7% against 99.7% in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between Singapore and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and United Kingdom?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and United Kingdom rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- Singapore ranks 18th and United Kingdom ranks 20th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.