South Africa vs Saint Lucia: Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)
South Africa
98.0%
in 2019
Saint Lucia
97.9%
in 2019
South Africa rank
73rd
Saint Lucia rank
74th
Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) over time
- South Africa
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 98.0% against 97.9% in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
South Africa ranks 73rd and Saint Lucia ranks 74th of 191 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.2% | 97.6% | 8.4% | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 93.9% | 97.5% | 3.6% | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita), South Africa or Saint Lucia?
- South Africa, at 98.0% against 97.9% in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) between South Africa and Saint Lucia?
- 0.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Saint Lucia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Saint Lucia rank globally for getting electricity: cost to get electricity (% of income per capita)?
- South Africa ranks 73rd and Saint Lucia ranks 74th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Cost to get electricity (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.