Antigua and Barbuda vs Georgia: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Georgia
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 90.46 against 90.25 in Georgia, a difference of 0.21.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 18th and Georgia ranks 19th of 183 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.49 | 74.29 | 16.2 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 90.42 | 83.8 | 6.62 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Georgia?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 90.46 against 90.25 in Georgia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Georgia?
- 0.21, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Georgia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Georgia rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 18th and Georgia ranks 19th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.