Bahamas vs Saudi Arabia: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Bahamas
81.31
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
81.54
in 2014
Bahamas rank
55th
Saudi Arabia rank
54th
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 81.54 against 81.31 in Bahamas, a difference of 0.23.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 55th and Saudi Arabia ranks 54th of 183 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.34 | 81.57 | 0.2292 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 81.34 | 81.54 | 0.2016 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Bahamas or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 81.54 against 81.31 in Bahamas as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Bahamas and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.23, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Saudi Arabia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Bahamas and Saudi Arabia rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 55th and Saudi Arabia ranks 54th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.