Belarus vs Sudan: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

Belarus
62.66
in 2014
Sudan
63.3
in 2014
Belarus rank
130th
Sudan rank
128th

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Sudan
020406080200920112014

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 63.3 against 62.66 in Belarus, a difference of 0.64.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 130th and Sudan ranks 128th of 181 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 48.42 62.96 14.53 Sudan
2010s 54.71 66.22 11.51 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Belarus or Sudan?
Sudan, at 63.3 against 62.66 in Belarus as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Belarus and Sudan?
0.64, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sudan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Belarus and Sudan rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Belarus ranks 130th and Sudan ranks 128th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.