Brazil vs Iraq: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

Brazil
73.59
in 2014
Iraq
72.72
in 2014
Brazil rank
97th
Iraq rank
100th

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • Iraq
020406080200920112014

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 73.59 against 72.72 in Iraq, a difference of 0.87.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Iraq ahead.

Brazil ranks 97th and Iraq ranks 100th of 181 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 71.81 76.04 4.23 Iraq
2010s 72.87 75.12 2.26 Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Brazil or Iraq?
Brazil, at 73.59 against 72.72 in Iraq as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Brazil and Iraq?
0.87, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iraq?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Brazil and Iraq rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Brazil ranks 97th and Iraq ranks 100th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.