Chile vs Tunisia: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

Chile
85.04
in 2014
Tunisia
84.59
in 2014
Chile rank
38th
Tunisia rank
41st

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Chile
  • Tunisia
020406080200920112014

How they compare

Chile currently reports 85.04 against 84.59 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.45.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 38th and Tunisia ranks 41st of 181 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 84.95 82.65 2.3 Chile
2010s 85.01 84.02 0.9894 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Chile or Tunisia?
Chile, at 85.04 against 84.59 in Tunisia as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Chile and Tunisia?
0.45, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tunisia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Chile and Tunisia rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Chile ranks 38th and Tunisia ranks 41st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.