China vs Jamaica: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

China
66.35
in 2014
Jamaica
65.48
in 2014
China rank
120th
Jamaica rank
122nd

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • China
  • Jamaica
0204060200920112014

How they compare

China currently reports 66.35 against 65.48 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.87.

Across all 6 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 120th and Jamaica ranks 122nd of 181 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Jamaica Difference Ahead
2000s 67.04 65.06 1.99 China
2010s 67.2 65.13 2.07 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, China or Jamaica?
China, at 66.35 against 65.48 in Jamaica as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between China and Jamaica?
0.87, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jamaica?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do China and Jamaica rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
China ranks 120th and Jamaica ranks 122nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.