Costa Rica vs Solomon Islands: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 82.94 against 82.72 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.22.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 48th and Solomon Islands ranks 47th of 183 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.2 | 65.84 | 15.37 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 81.68 | 68.29 | 13.4 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 82.94 against 82.72 in Costa Rica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Solomon Islands?
- 0.22, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Costa Rica and Solomon Islands rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 48th and Solomon Islands ranks 47th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.