Denmark vs Hong Kong (China): Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Denmark
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 91.54 against 91.07 in Denmark, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 14th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 13th of 183 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.04 | 83.57 | 7.48 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 91.05 | 89.71 | 1.34 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Denmark or Hong Kong (China)?
- Hong Kong (China), at 91.54 against 91.07 in Denmark as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Denmark and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0.47, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong (China)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Denmark and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Denmark ranks 14th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 13th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.