Egypt vs Jordan: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

Egypt
82.56
in 2014
Jordan
82.57
in 2014
Egypt rank
50th
Jordan rank
49th

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Egypt
  • Jordan
020406080200920112014

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 82.57 against 82.56 in Egypt, a difference of 0.01.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 50th and Jordan ranks 49th of 181 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 81.45 82.24 0.7949 Jordan
2010s 82.17 82.97 0.8063 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Egypt or Jordan?
Jordan, at 82.57 against 82.56 in Egypt as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Egypt and Jordan?
0.01, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Jordan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Egypt and Jordan rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Egypt ranks 50th and Jordan ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.