Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 73.84 against 73.83 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.01.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th and Nicaragua ranks 96th of 181 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.14 | 68.91 | 5.23 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 73.73 | 70.84 | 2.89 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Nicaragua?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 73.84 against 73.83 in Nicaragua as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 0.01, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 95th and Nicaragua ranks 96th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.