Gambia vs Laos: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

Gambia
55.62
in 2014
Laos
53.96
in 2014
Gambia rank
157th
Laos rank
160th

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Gambia
  • Laos
0204060200920112014

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 55.62 against 53.96 in Laos, a difference of 1.66.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Laos ahead.

Gambia ranks 157th and Laos ranks 160th of 181 countries.

Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Laos Difference Ahead
2000s 34.59 47.35 12.76 Laos
2010s 49.31 51.84 2.52 Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Gambia or Laos?
Gambia, at 55.62 against 53.96 in Laos as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Gambia and Laos?
1.66, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Laos?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Gambia and Laos rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Gambia ranks 157th and Laos ranks 160th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.