Guinea-Bissau vs Romania: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 41.48 against 35.96 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 5.52.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 174th and Romania ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.65 | 35.31 | 0.3444 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 36.33 | 36.73 | 0.3913 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Romania?
- Romania, at 41.48 against 35.96 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Romania?
- 5.52, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Romania rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 174th and Romania ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.