Hong Kong, China vs Timor-Leste: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 91.54 against 91.02 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.52.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Timor-Leste ranks 16th of 184 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.57 | 91.89 | 8.32 | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 89.71 | 90.93 | 1.22 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Hong Kong, China or Timor-Leste?
- Hong Kong, China, at 91.54 against 91.02 in Timor-Leste as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste?
- 0.52, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Timor-Leste rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Timor-Leste ranks 16th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.