Jordan vs Solomon Islands: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Jordan
82.57
in 2014
Solomon Islands
82.94
in 2014
Jordan rank
49th
Solomon Islands rank
47th
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 82.94 against 82.57 in Jordan, a difference of 0.37.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 49th and Solomon Islands ranks 47th of 181 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.24 | 65.84 | 16.4 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 82.97 | 68.29 | 14.69 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Jordan or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 82.94 against 82.57 in Jordan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Jordan and Solomon Islands?
- 0.37, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Jordan and Solomon Islands rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Jordan ranks 49th and Solomon Islands ranks 47th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.