Latvia vs Rwanda: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score

Latvia
80.28
in 2014
Rwanda
79.48
in 2014
Latvia rank
63rd
Rwanda rank
65th

Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Latvia
  • Rwanda
020406080200920112014

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 80.28 against 79.48 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.8.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 63rd and Rwanda ranks 65th of 181 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 72.51 66.47 6.04 Latvia
2010s 78.47 74.64 3.84 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Latvia or Rwanda?
Latvia, at 80.28 against 79.48 in Rwanda as of 2014.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Latvia and Rwanda?
0.8, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 63rd and Rwanda ranks 65th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,098 data points, 2009–2014
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.