Mauritius vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 87.56 against 87.27 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.29.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Mauritius ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.68 | 87.18 | 0.5058 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 87.26 | 87.23 | 0.0279 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Mauritius or Papua New Guinea?
- Mauritius, at 87.56 against 87.27 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.29, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 24th and Papua New Guinea ranks 26th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.