Norway vs Papua New Guinea: Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score
Norway
87.44
in 2014
Papua New Guinea
87.27
in 2014
Norway rank
25th
Papua New Guinea rank
26th
Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Norway
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Norway currently reports 87.44 against 87.27 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.17.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 25th and Papua New Guinea ranks 26th of 183 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.43 | 87.18 | 0.2485 | Norway |
| 2010s | 87.43 | 87.23 | 0.2039 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score, Norway or Papua New Guinea?
- Norway, at 87.44 against 87.27 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score between Norway and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.17, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Norway and Papua New Guinea rank globally for getting electricity (db10-15 methodology) - score?
- Norway ranks 25th and Papua New Guinea ranks 26th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB10-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-15 studies.