Angola vs Equatorial Guinea: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Angola
54.07
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
54.35
in 2019
Angola rank
154th
Equatorial Guinea rank
153rd

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Angola
  • Equatorial Guinea
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 54.35 against 54.07 in Angola, a difference of 0.28.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 154th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 188 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score, Angola or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 54.35 against 54.07 in Angola as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score between Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
0.28, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Angola and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Angola ranks 154th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.