Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Central African Republic
24.64
in 2019
South Sudan
0
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
185th
South Sudan rank
187th
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- South Sudan
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 24.64 against 0 in South Sudan, a difference of 24.64.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Sudan ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 187th of 190 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or South Sudan?
- Central African Republic, at 24.64 against 0 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 24.64, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and South Sudan rank globally for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 187th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.