Equatorial Guinea vs Palau: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
54.35
in 2019
Palau
54.88
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
153rd
Palau rank
151st

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Palau
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Palau currently reports 54.88 against 54.35 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.53.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd and Palau ranks 151st of 188 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Palau?
Palau, at 54.88 against 54.35 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Palau?
0.53, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Palau?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Palau rank globally for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 153rd and Palau ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.