Papua New Guinea vs Senegal: Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Papua New Guinea
65.54
in 2019
Senegal
65.22
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
117th
Senegal rank
118th

Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Senegal
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 65.54 against 65.22 in Senegal, a difference of 0.32.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 117th and Senegal ranks 118th of 188 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Senegal?
Papua New Guinea, at 65.54 against 65.22 in Senegal as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Senegal?
0.32, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Senegal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Papua New Guinea and Senegal rank globally for getting electricity (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Papua New Guinea ranks 117th and Senegal ranks 118th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for getting electricity is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost for a business to obtain a permanent electricity connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the reliability of supply and transparency of tariffs index. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.