Australia vs Cameroon: Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages
Australia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Cameroon
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Australia rank
1st
Cameroon rank
1st
Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages over time
- Australia
- Cameroon
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Cameroon, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 1st and Cameroon ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages, Australia or Cameroon?
- Australia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Cameroon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages between Australia and Cameroon?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cameroon?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Cameroon rank globally for getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages?
- Australia ranks 1st and Cameroon ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Th financial deterrents index evaluates whether financial deterrents exist to limit outages. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility compensates customers when outages exceed a certain cap, if the utility is fined by the regulator when outages exceed a certain cap or if both these conditions are met. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.