Belarus vs Sweden: Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages
Belarus
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Belarus rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages over time
- Belarus
- Sweden
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages, Belarus or Sweden?
- Belarus, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages between Belarus and Sweden?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Sweden rank globally for getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages?
- Belarus ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Th financial deterrents index evaluates whether financial deterrents exist to limit outages. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility compensates customers when outages exceed a certain cap, if the utility is fined by the regulator when outages exceed a certain cap or if both these conditions are met. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.