Chile vs North Macedonia: Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages
Chile
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
North Macedonia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Chile rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages, Chile or North Macedonia?
- Chile, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for getting electricity: financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages?
- Chile ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Financial deterrents aimed at limiting outages (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Th financial deterrents index evaluates whether financial deterrents exist to limit outages. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility compensates customers when outages exceed a certain cap, if the utility is fined by the regulator when outages exceed a certain cap or if both these conditions are met. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.