What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Belarus and China (People’s Republic of)?

0 DB16-20 methodology, with Belarus ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China (People’s Republic of)?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs China (People’s Republic of): Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)

Belarus

1 DB16-20 methodology

in 2019

China (People’s Republic of)

1 DB16-20 methodology

in 2019

Belarus rank

1st

China (People’s Republic of) rank

1st

Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time

Belarus
China (People’s Republic of)

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 6 years both countries report, China (People’s Republic of) has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 1st and China (People’s Republic of) ranks 1st of 186 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Belarus or China (People’s Republic of)?: Belarus, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Belarus and China (People’s Republic of)?: 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China (People’s Republic of)?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Belarus and China (People’s Republic of) rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?: Belarus ranks 1st and China (People’s Republic of) ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs China (People’s Republic of): Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-mechanisms-for-restoring-service-0-1-db16-20-methodology/belarus/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-mechanisms-for-restoring-service-0-1-db16-20-methodology/belarus/china/">Belarus vs China (People’s Republic of): Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit: DB16-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 186 places, 1,116 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.