Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Latvia: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Latvia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Latvia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.