What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Hong Kong, China and Montenegro?

0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Montenegro?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong, China vs Montenegro: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)

Hong Kong, China

1 DB16-20 methodology

in 2019

Montenegro

1 DB16-20 methodology

in 2019

Hong Kong, China rank

1st

Montenegro rank

1st

Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time

Hong Kong, China
Montenegro

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Montenegro, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 187 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Hong Kong, China or Montenegro?: Hong Kong, China, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Montenegro as of 2019.
What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Hong Kong, China and Montenegro?: 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Montenegro?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Montenegro rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?: Hong Kong, China ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Montenegro: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1). Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-mechanisms-for-restoring-service-0-1-db16-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/getting-electricity-mechanisms-for-restoring-service-0-1-db16-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/montenegro/">Hong Kong, China vs Montenegro: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit: DB16-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 187 places, 1,122 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.