Republic of Korea vs Portugal: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
Republic of Korea
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Portugal
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
1st
Portugal rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- Republic of Korea
- Portugal
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Portugal, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Republic of Korea or Portugal?
- Republic of Korea, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Portugal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Republic of Korea and Portugal?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Portugal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Portugal rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.