Republic of Korea vs Samoa: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
Republic of Korea
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Samoa
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
1st
Samoa rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- Republic of Korea
- Samoa
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Republic of Korea or Samoa?
- Republic of Korea, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Republic of Korea and Samoa?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Samoa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Samoa rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 1st and Samoa ranks 1st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.