Latvia vs Montenegro: Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)
Latvia
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Montenegro
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st
Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) over time
- Latvia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Montenegro, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1), Latvia or Montenegro?
- Latvia, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Montenegro as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) between Latvia and Montenegro?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Montenegro rank globally for getting electricity: mechanisms for restoring service (0-1)?
- Latvia ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: Mechanisms for restoring service (0-1) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The mechanisms for restoring service index evaluates what tools are used by the distribution utility to restore power supply. A score of 1 is assigned if the utility uses automated tools, such as an OMS/IMS or SCADA system. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.